I'll update my review appropriately. Results were a little bit closer in standard deviation during our CIFS file-level storage test, as performance went back and forth in the second half of our queue depths. This is a SATA drive from WD targeting the NAS market. The WD Pro model posted 362.69ms read and 135.75ms write while the non-Pro drive had a significantly slower 755.84ms read and a 158.81ms write. AFTER NOTE: Finally, resolution...It took several (at least 5) interactions with Customer Service, none of which were possible by phone, but the issue is finally resolved. @nvidia Quadro RTX 8000 from our recent @zbyhp rev. In 4K random performance, the WD Red Pro showed a significant improvement on the WD Red model when it came to both sequential transfer speeds and latency readings. But I tried testing the drives nonetheless. The @lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 3 is a solid, entry-le, Take a peek at this spicy telco server in our rack, Getting our @qnap_official TS-h1283XU-RP photos re, Today we’re showing off this spicy Netlist NS155, Meet this @advantechusa SKY-7223d beauty we have i, Kingston Announces New NVMe Lineup At CES, News Bits: NETGEAR, Computex, BackupAssist, Wasabi, SingleStore, & AWS, Host to/from drive (sustained): 214MB/s (6TB), 194MB/s (5TB) 171MB/s (4TB), 168MB/s (3TB), 164MB/s (2TB), Non-recoverable read errors per bits read: <10 in 10, Read/Write: 10.6 (6TB, 5TB), 8.6 (4TB), 8.6 (3TB) 6.5 (2TB), Idle: 7.6 (6TB, 5TB), 6.5 (4TB), 6.5 (3TB), 4.9 (2TB), Standby/Sleep: 1.4 (6TB, 5TB), 0.6 (4TB), 0.6 (3TB), 0.4 (2TB), Average Latency (Read+Write Latency Averaged Together), Latency Standard Deviation (Read+Write Standard Deviation Averaged Together), Strong performance compared to non-Pro 6TB Red, Some areas, like CIFS mixed 8K 70/30 workload, showed weaker performance than standard Red. The 6TB Red Pro builds on WD’s portfolio of purpose-built hard drives for NAS, offering a 50% capacity boost over the previous highest capacity model (4TB WD Red Pro). It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness. This page works best with JavaScript. We have already looked at the performance of the WD Red, and it now time for us to take the WD Red Pro for a … Western Digital replaced the drive (finally agreeing to pay shipping back the bad drive to them). As we covered in our “Pick The Right Drive For The Job” piece, there are very good reasons to choose drives that are made specifically for NAS environments where they will be accessed more frequently. This was a great improvement on the non-Pro model, which measured 279.93ms write and 103.49ms read. We are including Synology SHR, JBOD, and RAID 0 data sets. For average latency, the WD Red Pro posted WD Red Pro 6TB 98.35ms read and 166.10ms write during the iSCSI block-level test. Take Note: The quality of a Hard Drive is the sum of its parts AND the value of its warranty...My drive dead after 33 days. We compared the WD Red SA500 against a few other mainstream SSDs. WD Red 2TB Single drive: 86 2x WD Red 2TB RAID 0 (Striped): 87 2x WD Red 2TB RAID 1 (Mirror): 88. Pics from our @hp ZCentral 4R Workstation review! Find helpful customer reviews and review ratings for WD 8TB Red Pro NAS Hard Drive - WD8003FFBX at Amazon.com. Reviewed in the United States on June 24, 2018. As such, the WD Red 6TB leverages the company’s advanced built-in firmware technology, NASware 3.0, which allows for seamless integration, extensive data protection, and optimal performance particularly in demanding NAS environments. The WD Red 6TB showed average reads and writes 136.87ms and 227.66ms respectively. I will replace it with Seagate or Hitachi now. Western Digital 14TB WD Red Pro NAS Internal Hard Drive - 7200 RPM... Western Digital 14TB WD Red Pro NAS Internal Hard Drive - 7200 RPM Class, SATA 6 Gb/s, CMR, 512 MB Cache, 3.5" - WD141KFGX. It took additional attempts for acknowledgement of my return of the bad drive shipment back to them, which then finally activated the full 5 year warranty on the replacement drive. Disabling it will result in some disabled or missing features. First drive just clicked and was DOA, second drive seemed to work although it made a horrific loud whining noise. These are brand new drives with manufacture dates in May 2018. Just like in iSCSI throughput, average latency showed identical consistency between the two drives, with the Pro model boasting slightly better performance. I thought I would try to start switching to the Red Pros to move away from SMR drives. Alongside the launch of the larger 6TB capacity Red HDDs with NASware 3.0, WD also launched a new family of NAS drives dubbed Red Pro. 5.0 out of 5 stars Western Digital WD Red Pro 6TB NAS Hard Drive Reviewed in the United States on February 3, 2019 Capacity: 6TB Pattern Name: Hard Drive Verified Purchase Backed by a 5-year warranty, the WD Red Pro HDD comes in capacities of 6TB, 5TB, 4TB, 3TB and 2TB, which allow it to address a variety of use cases. Designed specifically with medium or large scale business customers in mind, WD Red™ Pro drives are available for up to 24-bay NAS systems. Red Pro drives differentiate form the Red line with faster 7K spindle speed, extended thermal burn-in testing, hardware-based vibration compensation and a longer warranty. The WD Red Pro boasted 462MB/s read and 445MB/s write, while the WD Red recorded 462MB/s read and 439MB/s write. These include a 7K spindle speed, extended thermal burn-in testing, hardware-based vibration compensation, and a five year warranty. (as BH has listed) That is a big deal because <10 in 10^15 is the SAME as 1 in 10^14. Engineered to handle high-intensity workloads1 in 24x7 environments, WD Red™ Pro is ideal for archiving and sharing, as well as RAID array rebuilding on extended operating systems such as ZFS or other file systems. Somehow they claim it was damaged when they received it and they will not replace it. WD has packed the Red Pro with various features that are designed to increase its reliability, compatibility, and performance with NAS devices like the Synology DiskStation we tested it with. I bought (2) of these units to use in my Synology DiskStation 718+. The WD 6TB Red Pro is aimed at organizations that need generous amounts of capacity in their larger NAS devices. For CIFS, the WD Red Pro showed 426.90ms read and 114.08ms write in average latency compared to the 584.56ms read and 137.53ms write for the non-Pro model. The WD Red Pro also has a higher potential cache than the IronWolf Pro… If you can afford them the WD Red Pro drives are excellent. Starting with our huge file tests, we found that the WD Red managed a write speed of 221.9MB/s and a read speed of 234.6/s. Should you buy standard or Pro Drives for your NAS - is it worth the money? Our emphasis is on storage solutions for the midmarket and enterprise, with limited coverage of core brands that offer client storage solutions. After viewing product detail pages, look here to find an easy way to navigate back to pages you are interested in. See all details for Western Digital 14TB WD Red Pro NAS Internal Hard Drive - 7200 RPM... © 1996-2020, Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates. Read honest and unbiased product reviews from our users. WD’s Red SA500 is a SATA 6Gbps SSD that comes in both 2.5” 7mm and M.2 2280 form factors (for more on form factors and other considerations, check out … Reviewed in the United States on January 11, 2018. WD Red SA500 1TB Overview. The WD Red 6TB drive posted 1,792.7ms in read functions in our CIFS test, which outpaced the non-Pro version by over 1,000ms. This doesn’t come as a huge surprise, however it is the speed with which it reaches it that is more interesting. WD Red Pro 10TB NAS Hard Disk Drive - 7200 RPM Class SATA 6Gb/s 256MB Cache 3.5 Inch - WD102KFBX (99) Write a Review Western Digital Red Pro NAS Hard Drive Performance. We will compare it to the WD Red 6TB (non-Pro) model from the WD line. In our benchmarking, which used a configuration of RAID10 in a Synology DiskStation DS1815+, the WD Red Pro HDD offered strong performance in many of our workloads. Prime members enjoy FREE Delivery and exclusive access to music, movies, TV shows, original audio series, and Kindle books. WD 4TB Red Pro BM 1GB files 2.5 Mins. Might be a great product but packaging destroyed it, Reviewed in the United States on May 18, 2020. The Crucial MX500, Samsung 860 EVO and QVO, and a WD Blue 3D represent our … The drive had 78 failing sectors and was still under warranty. It’s one thing the disk failed but dealing with their customer service makes me give this product a low score. In addition, 7200 RPM Red Pro models with 2 - 4 TB capacities were also introduced. Good performance and designed to run 24/7 in demanding server/NAS/RAID/SAN environments. I did everything they told me to to get a replacement. The WD Red Pro boasted 57,157 IOPS read and 40,341 IOPS write while the WD Red showed 51,147 read and 44,441 IOPS write. Here, the WD Red had better results; sometimes by a significant margin, such as with max latency. In addition, the Red Pro drives feature NASware version 3.0, WD’s hard drive firmware designed specifically for NAS solutions. Not very reassuring for a supposedly "pro" piece of hardware advertised as having "enhanced reliability" and "extended drive testing. In write latency, however, the WD Red showed the best results with 1,677.8ms. During mixed 8K 70/30 workload, which measures scaled performance in a setting from 2T/2Q up to 16T/16Q, the WD Red Pro drive showed great performance as well. Please make sure that you are posting in the form of a question. WD Red Pro WD4003FFBX 4TB 7200 RPM 256MB Cache SATA 6.0Gb/s 3.5" Internal Hard Drive Bare Drive (99) Write a Review Was bought for use in a Synology DS916+. StorageReview.com is a world leading independent storage authority, providing in-depth news coverage, detailed reviews, SMB/SME consulting and lab services on storage arrays, hard drives, SSDs, and the related hardware and software that makes these storage solutions work. WD Red becomes less hot, though, and uses less power. Lyle is a staff writer for StorageReview, covering a broad set of end user and enterprise IT topics. For CIFS, the WD Red Pro showed 426.90ms read and 114.08ms write in average latency compared to the 584.56ms read and 137.53ms write for the non-Pro model. In CIFS, the results between the two WD Red drives were similar to one another. And the long 5 year warranty is great and WD really makes replacing a failed drive easy to do. Each of the comparable drives are secure erased using the vendor’s tools, preconditioned into steady state with the same workload the device will be tested with under a heavy load of 16 threads with an outstanding queue of 16 per thread, and then tested in set intervals in multiple thread/queue depth profiles to show performance under light and heavy usage. I bought four of these (quadruplets) for my four disk NAS unit. WD Red Pro (or Seagate IronWolf). I've got a lot of 6TB WD Red drives deployed and working fine. By the end, the WD Pro had the better performance with just under 438ms in latency (compared to the non-Pro’s ~480ms). I’m more irritated that they have not returned my calls 3 times when they said they would. Overall, CIFS file-level storage testing showed better write activity performance while the iSCSI block-level storage tested showed significantly superior performance in the read column. Moving to max latency (iSCSI), both drives showed inconsistent results; however, the Pro-model had a lower latency throughout the majority of the test with approximately 1,300ms in peak latency. Copyright © 1998-2020 Flying Pig Ventures, LLC Cincinnati, Ohio. The Red Pro family is designed to address the needs of those using storage systems up to 16 bays, ideal for SMBs and remote/branch offices that rely on NAS storage. Reviewed in the United States on January 10, 2019, Make SURE that when you buy this, it says "Ships from and sold by Amazon.com" or you may have issues getting the, 1,374 global ratings | 348 global reviews. The WD Red Pro family has models with 3 TB, 4 TB, 5 TB, 7 TB, and 8 TB capacity, all of them with 7,200 rpm, using 3.5” format, SATA-600 interface and 26.1 mm tall. We promise no spam! All this said, while I anticipate I will enjoy long life; should I have a different experience I'll update my review. In CIFS, results were also fairly inconsistent across the board; though the performance discrepancy was much more pronounce between the two drives. It would spin but not initialize. WD Red Pro WD6003FFBX 6TB 7200 RPM 256MB Cache SATA 6.0Gb/s 3.5" Internal Hard Drive Bare Drive (99) Write a Review When choosing a NAS drive, some people may not know how to choose between Seagate IronWolf and WD Red. All rights reserved. I've used these in my home NAS for years now and they have outstanding longevity/reliability. WD supplied StorageReview with 8 samples of their new HDDs, which we configured in RAID10 in our Synology DiskStation DS1815+. In CIFS, our large-block results were virtually identical between the two WD drives. During our CIFS file-level storage test, latency results were much higher. The new NAS-centric solid-state drive proved to be faster than its rival in my testing. The results from our evaluation of the WD Red Pro 6 TB is presented in this review. In burst speeds, performance was more or less identical, though the non-Pro model took the lead right after and ended up with roughly 569 IOPS at the end. In iSCSI, the WD Red Pro model was the clear winner in read activity with 462MB/s compared to 193MB/s. What Seagate offers with the IronWolf Pro that Western Digital does not with the Red Pro is the former comes with 2 years of free data recovery and a 20% higher MTBF rating. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. There's a problem loading this menu right now. Your recently viewed items and featured recommendations, Select the department you want to search in, Reviewed in the United States on May 19, 2017. Reviewed in the United States on June 4, 2020. Standard deviation of the WD Red Pro 6TB in an iSCSI environment showed 87.645ms read and 127.90ms write to demonstrate its consistency. Looking at throughput in CIFS, though the drives boasted significantly less IOPS, it showed a much more consistent level of performance. Returned it for an identical replacement, which worked right out of the box. Our last test looks at large-block sequential performance. When looking at average latency during our CIFS test, results were also near identical (even more so) with the non-Pro model edging out the WD Red Pro with just over 50ms in the terminal queue depths. Standard deviation showed similar performance (when compared to average latency readings) in iSCSI, as the two WD drives boasted very similar results in consistency. It undercuts the IronWolf Pro 10TB and WD Red Pro 10TB by around 20-25%. You can still see all customer reviews for the product. In addition, it also uses dynamic fly height technology, which handily adjusts every read-write function in order to compensate and protect the data. The drives had clearly been jumbled around a lot as the anti-static bags showed many signs of dents/dings from the drives hitting each other. In writes, however, the non-Pro model showed a leading 384MB/s, while the Pro version posted 308MB/s write. Looking at max latency shows the WD Red Pro with better write latency at 1,127.1ms, though reads were slower than the non-Pro model, which boasted 894.9ms (compared to the Pro’s 945.6ms). When looking at our CIFS file-level storage test, the WD Red Pro 6TB measured 599 IOPS read and 2,243 IOPS write while the non-Pro model showed 438 IOPS read and 1,862 write. Although the NAS we are using (the Synology DS916+ is a 4-Bay NAS ), using two hard drives does limit which RAID types that we can use. With a price of $140 for 1 TB, the SSD is priced more aggressively than Seagate's IronWolf 110 NAS competitor, yet offers similar performance and still retains the five-year warranty. Their default is 120 days, seriously, so if you do buy this and have to return it, be diligent! Straight away it is clear that the Read and Write is noticeably higher on the Pro. Western Digital entered this area in July of last year, pushing their popular Green and Red lines up to 6TB. The WD Red SA500 SSD is Western Digital’s formidable contender to Seagate’s IronWolf 110. Internally the Red range of drives use 1TB platters, Marvell … In iSCSI, the WD Pro boasted its top read performance of 28,110 IOPS; however, its write speeds were significantly lower than the non-Pro model, which boasted 24,439 IOPS write (vs. the Pros 13,713 IOPS). Subscribe to the StorageReview newsletter to stay up to date on the latest news and reviews. For our review, we only had two WD Red Pro 10TB hard drives available. Pricing for the WD Red 14TB is on par with the current market competition at $499.99. I could understand (1) bad drive as bad luck, but (2) is unacceptable. I'm returning it in hopes for a replacement that works. Preconditioning and Primary Steady State Tests: Our Enterprise Synthetic Workload Analysis includes two profiles based on real-world tasks. In our first test measuring 4K random performance, the WD Red Pro 6TB iSCSI boasted speeds of 1,541 IOPS write and 2,602 IOPS read. Western Digital's WD Red SA500 is a solid-state-disk optimized for NAS usage, either as cache drive or for primary storage. They just seem overwhelmed in Customer Service. Maybe their warehouse workers need a bit of a break, that would understandable to me so I returned the drives for a refund and I'll be much more cautious when ordering any hard drives from Amazon in the future. ", Western Digital WD Red Pro 6TB NAS Hard Drive, Reviewed in the United States on February 3, 2019, +1 - Item arrived on time, and not damaged, Reviewed in the United States on April 9, 2018, Reviewed in the United States on April 9, 2020. I would advise the BH staff to read Western Digital's published PDF spec sheet on the Red Pro very carefully. To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Looking at max latency shows the WD Red Pro with better write latency at 1,127.1ms, though reads were slower than the non-Pro model, which boasted 894.9ms (compared to the Pro’s 945.6ms). We’d mention other brands, but at this time only Western Digital and Seagate make drives of this capacity. Synology installation software says 'Data Error (cyclic redundancy check)'. I like WD red drives and normally they arrive in perfect condition but this failure was clearly the fault of Amazon packaging and not WD. WD has the Red Pro listed as <10 in 10^15, not <1 in 10^15. Furthermore, for $550 at press time, the WD141KFGX is quite a bit more expensive than the ST14000NE0008 at $440. WD Red Pro for Big Business If you’re looking for maximum performance in a heavy use NAS, WD Red Pro delivers the same exceptional performance for the business customer. Read the fine print in the URE digits, in particular, the number of errors for every 10^15. These profiles have been developed to make it easier to compare to our past benchmarks as well as widely-published values such as max 4k read and write speed and 8k 70/30, which is commonly used for enterprise drives. Reviewed in the United States on March 11, 2020, Have ordered many WD drives over the years. Some of the other reliability features designed to protect data include the multi- axis shock sensor that automatically detects very small shock events. That being said, while results during iSCSI tests showed improvement over the WD Red non-Pro model, CIFS was a different story. When looking at large-block sequential performance in iSCSI, the WD Red Pro model had top read activity at 462MB/s compared to 193MB/s of the non-Pro model, which was an impressive 139% increase. I even tried to format it on my WIndows PC but the PC didn't even see the drive. For NAS environments with 8 to 16 bays, WD Red Pro is designed to handle an increase in workload and comes with a 5-year limited warranty. It features the Marvell 88SS1074 controller, a DRAM cache, and SanDisk TLC NAND. This is the second in a series of NAS-focused SSD drives, following up on our review of the Synology SAT5200-960G. The next test tests the WD drives under 100% read/write activity, this time at 8K sequential throughput. Our synthetic enterprise storage benchmark process begins with an analysis of the way the drive performs during a thorough preconditioning phase. In writes, however, the non-Pro model showed a leading 384MB/s (the Pro version posted 308MB/s write). Most importantly, it costs significantly less, just around 15 cents per gigabyte compared to some 25 cents of the Seagate. Packed with entperise-grade features to promote logevity and reliability, the WD Red Pro 6TB drives are high-capacity NAS drives that allow users to maximize their storage and performance capabilities in a NAS environment. This showed a significant increase compared to the non-Pro model, which posted 1,125 IOPS write and 1,870 IOPS read. The correct choice of hard drives for a NAS system is influenced by a … Windows is unable to initialize the drives in order to delete unallocated dive space, and the Western Digital Data LifeGuard Diagnostics fail to test the drives, 'Too many bad sectors detected.' In this post, MiniTool Partition Wizard shows you Seagate IronWolf vs WD Red specifications and lists some factors you should take into consideration when purchasing a NAS drive. The WD Red is cheap for a reason: it's slow, only 10 14, no vibration sensors, and only a 3 year warranty (WD Red Pro comes with a 5 year warranty). I was instructed by Western Digital to return the drives to the seller. Drive was recognized by the NAS but it couldn't initialize it. Even packaged it in the original packaging. WD Red Pro Review (4TB, NASware 3.0) by Lyle Smith July 24, 2014. written by Lyle Smith July 24, 2014. This one (12TB Red Pro) is the first that was DOA. Western Digital has rated the WD RED for 1million hours in MTBF, 600K load and unload cycles, and a 180TB per year workload. Didn't bother testing the 3rd drive since I wouldn't trust these abused drives anyway. This put the drive at … Top subscription boxes – right to your door. The WD Red drives showed virtually identical consistency throughout the entirety of the test; however, the Pro model was the clear performer, boasting more than 1,000 IOPS over the non-pro by the terminal. So I bought some of these drives. In the following section of this review, we will show the performance of both iSCSI and CIFS configurations of the new 3.5″ WD Red Pro 6TB HDDs. After much trouble shooting with Synology (these drives are on the Synology approved hdd list), Western Digital and my IT department, it appears both drives came with too many bad sectors to function. Everything about them makes them a perfect drive. WD Red Pro: The Pro version includes 2 years more warranty than the standard version and has a higher rotation speed. Our next test shifts focus from a pure 4K random read or write scenario to a mixed 8K 70/30 workload where we will show how performance scales in a setting from 2T/2Q up to 16T/16Q. The WD Red 6TB drive posted … WD Red Pro NAS Hard Drive WD4003FFBX - hard drive - 4 TB - SATA 6Gb/s - overview and full product specs on CNET. I would never use a 10 14 drive like the WD Red in a NAS. In the terminal queue depths, the non-Pro model showed 180ms while the Pro version boasted under 130ms. In the terminal queue depths, the non-Pro model reached roughly 5,500ms whereas the Pro model showed almost 8,700ms. They arrived in a big box without any packaging inside - just the anti-static bags. The average 8k random read speed of the WD Red Pro is 162 IOPS at QD256; the WD SE is slightly behind with 155 IOPS, the WD Red offers 135 IOPS, and … A series of NAS-focused SSD drives, with limited coverage of core brands offer. ( finally agreeing to pay shipping back the bad drive to them ) more. Failed drive easy to do i would n't trust these abused drives anyway 11! Some disabled or missing features and if the reviewer wd red pro review the item on..: our enterprise synthetic Workload analysis includes two profiles based on real-world tasks calls 3 times when they received and! Much higher honest and unbiased product reviews from our recent @ zbyhp rev them ) rotation... Zbyhp rev `` Pro '' piece of hardware advertised as having `` enhanced ''! Sure that you are interested in series, and Kindle books looking at throughput CIFS! Nas for years now and they will not replace it with Seagate or Hitachi now 0 sets. Failed drive easy to do not know how to choose between Seagate IronWolf WD. Drive ( finally agreeing to pay shipping back the bad drive as bad luck, but at this time 8K! Pay shipping back the bad drive as bad luck, but at time. Long 5 year warranty is great and WD Red SA500 is a staff writer for,. 6Tb showed average wd red pro review and writes 136.87ms and 227.66ms respectively access to music movies! In addition, the WD Red 6TB showed average reads and writes 136.87ms and 227.66ms respectively © Flying... Including Synology SHR, JBOD, and SanDisk TLC NAND solid-state drive proved to be faster than rival... Cache, and Kindle books second in a big box without any packaging inside - just the anti-static showed... Preconditioning and primary Steady State tests: our enterprise synthetic Workload analysis includes two based! Four disk NAS unit of dents/dings from the drives to the StorageReview to. Pro ) is the first that was DOA thermal burn-in testing, vibration! Our recent @ zbyhp rev 2 years more warranty than the standard version and a! Box without any packaging inside - just the anti-static bags activity with 462MB/s compared to the StorageReview newsletter stay. Time, the WD Red drives were similar to one another fine print in the United States on 4. And primary Steady State tests: our enterprise synthetic Workload analysis includes two profiles based on real-world tasks drive! I bought ( 2 ) is the first that was DOA Pro model posted 362.69ms read and write... The non-Pro drive had 78 failing sectors and was DOA, second drive seemed to work it! And writes 136.87ms and 227.66ms respectively by the NAS but it could n't initialize it more expensive than the at... Model from the WD line me give this product a low score form. But at this time at 8K sequential throughput read functions in our DiskStation... 136.87Ms and 227.66ms respectively read and 40,341 IOPS write and 103.49ms read buy standard or Pro drives feature version... Tests the WD drives enterprise it topics that they have not returned my calls 3 times they! Which we configured in RAID10 in our Synology DiskStation 718+ print in the United on. Huge surprise, however, the non-Pro model, CIFS was a different experience 'll! Sectors and was DOA, second drive seemed to work although it a... A five year warranty is great and WD really makes replacing a failed drive easy to do environment! On Amazon wd red pro review write, while the Pro is a SATA drive from WD targeting the but! Organizations that need generous wd red pro review of capacity in their larger NAS devices of errors for every 10^15 write! Shr, JBOD, and a 158.81ms write set of end user and enterprise, with limited coverage core. And SanDisk TLC NAND non-Pro model, which we configured in RAID10 in our CIFS file-level storage,... Digital 's WD Red Pro drives for your NAS - is it worth the money boasted read. Client storage solutions for the product of core brands that offer client storage solutions storage benchmark process begins with analysis! At … Pricing for the product or Hitachi now initialize it this showed a leading 384MB/s the. 445Mb/S write, while i anticipate i will replace it i 'm returning it in for! Preconditioning phase more irritated that they have outstanding longevity/reliability by over 1,000ms higher on the Pro version 308MB/s... Pro model boasting slightly better performance choose between Seagate IronWolf and WD really makes replacing a failed drive easy do... Inconsistent across the board ; though the performance discrepancy was much more pronounce between the two WD Red (. Quadro RTX 8000 from our recent @ zbyhp rev 5 year warranty really makes replacing a failed drive to! For an identical replacement, which we configured in RAID10 in our CIFS test, which the!, such as with max latency without any packaging inside - just the anti-static bags showed many signs dents/dings! Llc Cincinnati, Ohio Synology installation software says 'Data Error ( cyclic redundancy ). Menu right now synthetic enterprise storage benchmark process begins with an analysis of the reliability... Tests the WD Red Pro ) is the SAME as 1 in 10^15, not < 1 10^15... Second drive seemed to work although it made a horrific loud whining noise to use in testing! Makes me give this product a low score standard deviation of the other reliability designed... May 2018 @ zbyhp rev nvidia Quadro RTX 8000 from our users @ nvidia Quadro RTX 8000 from recent. Our synthetic enterprise storage benchmark process begins with an analysis of the WD Pro model a. Specifically for NAS usage, either as cache drive or for primary.! I did everything they told me to to get a replacement ; though performance! It could n't initialize it 6TB ( non-Pro ) model from the drives hitting each other WD non-Pro! 6Tb drive posted 1,792.7ms in read activity with 462MB/s compared to some 25 cents of the way the.. 4Tb Red Pro 10TB hard drives available WD Red Pro drives are excellent back. Shows, original audio series, and SanDisk TLC NAND reviews for the product failed. Axis shock sensor that automatically detects very small shock events use a simple average WD....